Search for: All records

In education, intelligent learning environments allow students to choose how to tackle open-ended tasks while monitoring performance and behavior, allowing for the creation of adaptive support to help students overcome challenges. Timely feedback is critical to aid students’ progression toward learning and improved problem-solving. Feedback on text-based student responses can be delayed when teachers are overloaded with work. Automated evaluation can provide quick student feedback while easing the manual evaluation burden for teachers in areas with a high teacher-to-student ratio. Current methods of evaluating student essay responses to questions have included transformer-based natural language processing models with varying degrees of success. One main challenge in training these models is the scarcity of data for student-generated data. Larger volumes of training data are needed to create models that perform at a sufficient level of accuracy. Some studies have vast data, but large quantities are difficult to obtain when educational studies involve student-generated text. To overcome this data scarcity issue, text augmentation techniques have been employed to balance and expand the data set so that models can be trained with higher accuracy, leading to more reliable evaluation and categorization of student answers to aid teachers in the student’s learning progression. This paper examines the text-generating AI model, GPT-3.5, to determine if prompt-based text-generation methods are viable for generating additional text to supplement small sets of student responses for machine learning model training. We augmented student responses across two domains using GPT-3.5 completions and used that data to train a multilingual BERT model. Our results show that text generation can improve model performance on small data sets over simple self-augmentation. 

Computer-supported education studies can perform two important roles. They can allow researchers to gather important data about student learning processes, and they can help students learn more efficiently and effectively by providing automatic immediate feedback on what the students have done so far. The evaluation of student work required for both of these roles can be relatively easy in domains like math, where there are clear right answers. When text is involved, however, automated evaluations become more difficult. Natural Language Processing (NLP) can provide quick evaluations of student texts. However, traditional neural network approaches require a large amount of data to train models with enough accuracy to be useful in analyzing student responses. Typically, educational studies collect data but often only in small amounts and with a narrow focus on a particular topic. BERT-based neural network models have revolutionized NLP because they are pre-trained on very large corpora, developing a robust, contextualized understanding of the language. Then they can be “fine-tuned” on a much smaller set of data for a particular task. However, these models still need a certain base level of training data to be reasonably accurate, and that base level can exceed that provided by educational applications, which might contain only a few dozen examples. In other areas of artificial intelligence, such as computer vision, model performance on small data sets has been improved by “data augmentation” — adding scaled and rotated versions of the original images to the training set. This has been attempted on textual data; however, augmenting text is much more difficult than simply scaling or rotating images. The newly generated sentences may not be semantically similar to the original sentence, resulting in an improperly trained model. In this paper, we examine a self-augmentation method that is straightforward and shows great improvements in performance with different BERT-based models in two different languages and on two different tasks that have small data sets. We also identify the limitations of the self-augmentation procedure.